Thoughts on the H3Cincy Program me cynical. Call me old school. You might even call me old-fashioned, but i cannot see the benefit of programs such as the H3Cincy program. There have been many programs of this sort over the years, but I have never seen any results that show any value or return on the investment. Are the outcomes of such programs even quantifiable? How is it to be known if any of the involved youths chose a life of lawfulness over that of an outlaw as a result of participating in such a program? How can it be determined if the money was well spent? Does a program such as this reach a large enough percentage of the youth population or have an overall impact on future crime rates? I think all these, and many more questions need to be asked and answered, but to my knowledge they have never been. So let us ask them now. 

First off, let us examine the current H3Cincy program. It is my understanding that this program has run now for several weeks. The program has attracted approximately 200 young individuals to participate at a limited number of recreation centers throughout the city. The first question I would have to ask, is what percentage of all youths in the targeted age range are impacted? What percent of the total population of youths in the city are represented by those participating 200? Another question would be, of those 200 participating youths, what percentage of them will be dissuaded from participating in a criminal lifestyle solely because of the influence of the program? And what percentage of the 200 would never have considered a life of crime, regardless of the influence of the program? I realize that most, if not all, of these questions cannot and will not be answered. However, the core of the questions represent a thought process that needs to be addressed.

As a payer of taxes, an individual needs to ask if there money is being wisely spent on a program that minimally impacts the potential for crime. I know, the first response will be, the program is funded through asset forfeiture and does not cost the tax payer. But is this really true? Is there not still an impact on the tax dollar you have spent? Consider this. Asset forfeiture is money acquired by the police department as a result of seizure of money and assets of drug dealers caught by the agency. But tax dollars fund the law enforcement efforts that generated the seizures. Therefore, taxpayers are invested in the efforts and taxpayers have the right to question the effectiveness of the program. Once the questions are asked, and the answers are, or are not, forthcoming, do we continue, and if so, why?

Surely there is more reason for this type of program other than opportunity for the Police Chief to get photographed and his sound bites to be aired on the 6:00 O’clock news. The question is, why is the Police Department involved in providing activities that are better served by the experts at the Recreation Department? In my opinion, I think it is time for the police to get back to doing what the police are commissioned to do, enforce the law,  protect society, and put the bad guys in jail. But then, that’s just me.

Those are my thoughts, what are yours?

Please consider commenting, liking, sharing, and subscribing to this blog.

Tom Lind

View posts by Tom Lind
If you want to know something about me or have a question about this website, send your question via the Feedback Form and I will be happy to respond.


  1. ScottyMarch 24, 2014

    Tom- In a time of many police agencies becoming brown shirt, jack boot, bullies- I think it is important that the police become even more socially responsive.

  2. judy aka judi aka judithMarch 24, 2014

    I think it is really important for at risk youth to interact with police officers and have a chance to know them outside of the stereotypes or negative encounters they are likely to have without these types of questions.The kids have a chance to gain respect for law enforcement and possibly bring that back to their communities.Admittedly these are not answers to your questions just my intuitive response.

  3. judy aka judi aka judithMarch 24, 2014

    I did not mean to say types of questions I meant to say types of encounters!

  4. Ken wellsApril 7, 2014

    I like reading the blog. This is the first comment. Programs come and go this is true, I hope they will continue to monitor this program for the results you speak of. A phrased approach I believe May be valuable with a change to social worker and teacher and parent with this group. I wonder if anybody from UC is involved in driving this program to the next level. Something has to be tired from time to time, but you are right in the cost money and time for small results if any. But I am hopeful small changes lead to compounding benefits in the future. Only time will tell.


Feel free to comment, why should I have the last word.

Scroll to top